<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Total Bailout Cost Now $12.8 Trillion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geldpress.com/2009/04/total-bailout-cost-now-128-trillion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geldpress.com/2009/04/total-bailout-cost-now-128-trillion/</link>
	<description>Finance, Stock Options, Politics, Economics, Stock Market News, and Technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:21:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lethcoe</title>
		<link>http://www.geldpress.com/2009/04/total-bailout-cost-now-128-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-1018</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lethcoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geldpress.com/?p=588#comment-1018</guid>
		<description>If the Government had given the $42,000 per person to the people,
houses would be paid up or paid off and the collapse would not have happened.
People would paid off their credit cards and the banks would not have needed the bail out.
People would have bought cars and the car companies would be doing fine.
The whole country would have won.
Instead it was given to the corpations who asorbed most of it and the economy still is in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Government had given the $42,000 per person to the people,<br />
houses would be paid up or paid off and the collapse would not have happened.<br />
People would paid off their credit cards and the banks would not have needed the bail out.<br />
People would have bought cars and the car companies would be doing fine.<br />
The whole country would have won.<br />
Instead it was given to the corpations who asorbed most of it and the economy still is in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Obama Reject A Second Stimulus? &#124; Geldpress</title>
		<link>http://www.geldpress.com/2009/04/total-bailout-cost-now-128-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Obama Reject A Second Stimulus? &#124; Geldpress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geldpress.com/?p=588#comment-962</guid>
		<description>[...] rejecting another stimulus, but with a national debt over $11.5 trillion, and a financial disaster bailout cost of $12.8 trillion, lets hope Obama has finally come to his senses and does actually reject any additional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rejecting another stimulus, but with a national debt over $11.5 trillion, and a financial disaster bailout cost of $12.8 trillion, lets hope Obama has finally come to his senses and does actually reject any additional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question anyone going? - Page 2 - Nebraska Fish and Game Association</title>
		<link>http://www.geldpress.com/2009/04/total-bailout-cost-now-128-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Question anyone going? - Page 2 - Nebraska Fish and Game Association</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geldpress.com/?p=588#comment-816</guid>
		<description>[...] has already been done. I think I will go fishing Saturday instead and try not to think about it.   Total Bailout Cost Now $12.8 Trillion &#124; Geldpress   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has already been done. I think I will go fishing Saturday instead and try not to think about it.   Total Bailout Cost Now $12.8 Trillion | Geldpress   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerAl</title>
		<link>http://www.geldpress.com/2009/04/total-bailout-cost-now-128-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerAl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geldpress.com/?p=588#comment-796</guid>
		<description>Some part of those funds could be coming back (how much and effect is still TBD) so it may not be quite the same as welfare.  Check this out: http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2009/04/02/banks-are-repaying-bailout-money-hooray.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some part of those funds could be coming back (how much and effect is still TBD) so it may not be quite the same as welfare.  Check this out: <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2009/04/02/banks-are-repaying-bailout-money-hooray.aspx" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('a/www.fool.com');" rel="nofollow">http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2009/04/02/banks-are-repaying-bailout-money-hooray.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

