<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Source of 23.7 Trillion Bailout Cost? SIGTARP Report Summary.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/</link>
	<description>Finance, Stock Options, Politics, Economics, Stock Market News, and Technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:21:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Controlled Demolition of the Economy &#171; Vanguard of Freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/comment-page-1/#comment-1592</link>
		<dc:creator>Controlled Demolition of the Economy &#171; Vanguard of Freedom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geldpress.com/?p=887#comment-1592</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/"  rel="nofollow">http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $23.7 trillion has been given to bailout and backstop our corrupt financial system &#124; The Layoff List</title>
		<link>http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>$23.7 trillion has been given to bailout and backstop our corrupt financial system &#124; The Layoff List</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geldpress.com/?p=887#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>[...] There is an nice breakdown of the trillions in bailouts and backstops shown at Source of 23.7 Trillion Bailout Cost? SIGTARP Report Summary. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is an nice breakdown of the trillions in bailouts and backstops shown at Source of 23.7 Trillion Bailout Cost? SIGTARP Report Summary. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US Government on the Hook for $23 Trillion “Total potential support” For Bailouts &#8212; according to the US Government&#8217;s own oversight commission &#171; Dregs of the Future</title>
		<link>http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/comment-page-1/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator>US Government on the Hook for $23 Trillion “Total potential support” For Bailouts &#8212; according to the US Government&#8217;s own oversight commission &#171; Dregs of the Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geldpress.com/?p=887#comment-1434</guid>
		<description>[...] February 4, 2010 by prof77    Excerpted from: http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/?source=patrick.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 4, 2010 by prof77    Excerpted from: <a href="http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/?source=patrick.net"  rel="nofollow">http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/?source=patrick.net</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jowers</title>
		<link>http://www.geldpress.com/2010/02/bailout-237-trillion-sigtarp/comment-page-1/#comment-1433</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geldpress.com/?p=887#comment-1433</guid>
		<description>Also one needs to consider the loan ratios and derivatives. That is, $1.4T in printed credit then loaned at a very low rate might be used to drive supposedly liquid asset numbers. Based on these 4x, 10x, or even 66x (in the UK) may be loaned. If 1 person in 10 came to the bank and asked for their money, then 9 others would get nothing. Actually, it could be more like 65 others would get nothing. $2.3T FDIC potential backing cannot begin to touch this risk. How would the FED print more &quot;Federal Reserve Notes&quot; to cover it? So far, it has. Expanding the credit bubble. Like any other bubble, there&#039;s lots to be made before it pops. One trader made $100M last year himself. The average bonus at the major henchmen in the credit scheme are paying uot at mabye $700K ($500K bonuses) per employee per year. Sure, the bubble will pop, but one doesn&#039;t need but two or three years at $700K to retire. So, those &quot;in the know&quot; are not worried because they are also &quot;in the dough&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also one needs to consider the loan ratios and derivatives. That is, $1.4T in printed credit then loaned at a very low rate might be used to drive supposedly liquid asset numbers. Based on these 4x, 10x, or even 66x (in the UK) may be loaned. If 1 person in 10 came to the bank and asked for their money, then 9 others would get nothing. Actually, it could be more like 65 others would get nothing. $2.3T FDIC potential backing cannot begin to touch this risk. How would the FED print more &#8220;Federal Reserve Notes&#8221; to cover it? So far, it has. Expanding the credit bubble. Like any other bubble, there&#8217;s lots to be made before it pops. One trader made $100M last year himself. The average bonus at the major henchmen in the credit scheme are paying uot at mabye $700K ($500K bonuses) per employee per year. Sure, the bubble will pop, but one doesn&#8217;t need but two or three years at $700K to retire. So, those &#8220;in the know&#8221; are not worried because they are also &#8220;in the dough&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
